<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M27 The Dumbbell Nebula &#8211; revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286</link>
	<description>Photographer and Nature Lover ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tuguldur</title>
		<link>http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuguldur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286#comment-26</guid>
		<description>hey thanks for the response. I am mainly interested for some planetary NGC nebulaes. WO 80ED performs perfect for wide field images, but it is not sufficient enough for those tiny diamonds.

I am also doing some &quot;research&quot; on Orion 127mm Mak-Cass scope. Will decide soon whether C6 or Apex.

Tuugii</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey thanks for the response. I am mainly interested for some planetary NGC nebulaes. WO 80ED performs perfect for wide field images, but it is not sufficient enough for those tiny diamonds.</p>
<p>I am also doing some &#8220;research&#8221; on Orion 127mm Mak-Cass scope. Will decide soon whether C6 or Apex.</p>
<p>Tuugii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antamuk</title>
		<link>http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>antamuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the encouragement there.

Yes I think Celestron have made a great little scope with their 6inch SCT. Sometimes I think that a bit more focal length would be good but I don&#039;t think I&#039;d swap it, in truth I&#039;d want a C9.25 as well. I haven&#039;t done any scientific measurements on it but my gut feel is that its pretty good for the money.

All that said I&#039;m very much in love with the Canon lenses too - the L series APO is stunning but so it should be for considerably more outlay than the 6&quot; SCT !!!

I&#039;ve heard really good things about the Williams Optics ED80, it should be really great for many nebulous objects. What sort of objects interest you Tuguldor?

Clear Skies
AnnMarie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the encouragement there.</p>
<p>Yes I think Celestron have made a great little scope with their 6inch SCT. Sometimes I think that a bit more focal length would be good but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d swap it, in truth I&#8217;d want a C9.25 as well. I haven&#8217;t done any scientific measurements on it but my gut feel is that its pretty good for the money.</p>
<p>All that said I&#8217;m very much in love with the Canon lenses too &#8211; the L series APO is stunning but so it should be for considerably more outlay than the 6&#8243; SCT !!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard really good things about the Williams Optics ED80, it should be really great for many nebulous objects. What sort of objects interest you Tuguldor?</p>
<p>Clear Skies<br />
AnnMarie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuguldur</title>
		<link>http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuguldur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286#comment-24</guid>
		<description>that is an amazing result! you images taken with that C6 is darn perfect! I love them.

In fact, how handy is that C6? I mean, how is it&#039;s performance?

I have William Optics Zenithstar 80mm ED semi-apochromat refractor, although its quite fast, the field of view is too large, and the focal length is too short for my objects of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is an amazing result! you images taken with that C6 is darn perfect! I love them.</p>
<p>In fact, how handy is that C6? I mean, how is it&#8217;s performance?</p>
<p>I have William Optics Zenithstar 80mm ED semi-apochromat refractor, although its quite fast, the field of view is too large, and the focal length is too short for my objects of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annmariejones.me.uk/astronomy/m27-the-dumbbell-nebula-revisited-286#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Nice - what a difference long exposure times make. Hope you get some good viewing so you can get even more detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8211; what a difference long exposure times make. Hope you get some good viewing so you can get even more detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

